Payment Card Interchange Fees and Merchant Service Charges: An International Comparison

by Fumiko Hayashi As payment cards have become an increasingly important electronic retail payment type in many countries, payment card fees, especially interchange fees, have become the source of a good deal of controversy. Read more



Heartland Settles with Visa, Agrees to Pay Nearly $60 Million for ...

Digital Transactions Gartner Inc. security analyst Avivah Litan has estimated the Visa issuers' losses at about $50 million, not including customer-service expenses



Eye on Processing: Glitches Strike in U.S., Germany, And Australia

Payment card processing glitches struck in the U.S., Germany, and Australia over the past week. Although full details about them still aren’t known, the foreign ones apparently involved... http://www.digitaltransactions.net/newsstory.cfm?newsid=2415



Consumers Favor Debit Cards, But Prepaid Cards Lag Far Behind

While electronic payment methods continue to gain ground against paper-based payments, consumers show widely varying attitudes toward specific types of electronic methods, according to a recently... http://www.digitaltransactions.net/newsstory.cfm?newsid=2412



Bill Me Later hit with class-action lawsuit over interest rates

Baltimore Business Journal Bill Me Later is an online payment processor that Internet retailers use to boost sales. When making a purchase online, consumers who choose to use Bill Me

Ingenico Introduces End-to-End Security Solutions for Merchants

Ingenico has announced a "comprehensive strategy to provide secure end-to-end solutions to assist merchants in complying with the PCI Data Security Standards." Ingenico says its strategy addresses the entire payment transaction process including: data in flight, data at rest, and architecture.



MALICIOUS BANKING APP FOUND ON ANDROID MARKET

First Tech Credit Union has warned that a malicious application designed to steal banking details has made its way onto Google's Android Market. More on this story: http://www.finextra.com/news/fullstory.aspx?newsitemid=20930



Best Buy Cuts off Visa Contactless with Little Risk to Sales

Digital Transactions A source close to Visa tells Digital Transactions News that Visa made a business decision not to support payWave with PIN debit.



Facebook Payments Operation Could Rival Paypal

ADOTAS by Gavin Dunaway | ADOTAS – As it aims for a larger slice of the virtual goods pie and possibly step on PayPal's turf, Facebook has put up notice that it is ...



Lawsuit Challenges Bill Me Later Fees

American Banker (subscription) By Daniel Wolfe The fee structure of eBay's Bill Me Later instant credit service violates a California consumer protection law, according to a law firm that



Banks and Card Issuers Are Investing in Technology to Speed-up and Improve Reporting and Prevention of Fraud

Studies by a division of the US treasury, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), determined that suspicious transactions related to credit card fraud increased by 95% from 2007 to 2008, a figure that is expected to rise again by the close of 2009. As a result, banks need to stay on top of ways they can improve their handling of fraud cases by speeding up resolution processes, increasing effectiveness and investing in new technologies. Read more



Facebook looking to beef up e-commerce team

CNET by Caroline McCarthy Facebook is turning up the heat on becoming a big player in the online payments world, according to a couple of job postings for a new ...



Is Google the best candidate to create a good, customer-focused cloud banking ...

ZDNet (blog) I have had it with credit cards, banks, mutual fund companies, PayPal, debit cards, MasterCard and Visa. As far as I'm concerned they are all fired. ...



What retailers have mobile sites or apps?

istockAnalyst.com (press release) According to a recent Foresee Results survey, one-third of online shoppers already use their mobile phones for M-Commerce. These shoppers pulled out their







The Different Fraud Protections for Signatures and PINs: THE NEW YORK TIMES By JENNIFER SARANOW SCHULTZ



Last week’s New York Times article “How Visa, Using Card Fees, Dominates a Market” detailed the behind-the-scenes struggle between banks and retailers to encourage customers to sign when making debit card purchases or to punch in their PIN because of the higher fees that stores pay banks for signatures.



Many readers took issue with the notion in the article that the debate over signing versus typing in a PIN “is a pointless distinction to most consumers, since the price is the same either way.”



Some readers said they felt there actually was a big difference between signatures and PINs for consumers in terms of fees and cost, safety and protection against fraud and purchase records, among other issues.



We’ve boiled this down to four main points: which costs more, which is safer, which offers more protection in the case of fraud and which is easier to track.



Last week, we looked at the cost differences for consumers and on Monday, we looked at which use of a debit card might better protect consumers’ accounts from the risk of fraud. (To be sure, many people think using credit is better than using any kind of debit transaction, but we’ll save that issue for another series.)



In this installment, we look at the differences in protections available if you’re a victim of signature vs. PIN transaction fraud and we’ll cover the remaining issue in our next installment.



Q. What are the differences, if any, in protections available if you’re a victim of signature vs. PIN transaction fraud?



A. If you’re the victim of fraud, the protections available to you can be very different depending on whether the transaction in question was done with a signature or a PIN and depending on which network processed the transaction.



Federal law generally limits consumer liability in debit card transaction fraud to $50, if the consumer notifies the financial institution within two business days. When timely notice is not given, the cap under federal law is $500, assuming other reporting requirements are met.



But some transaction networks offer consumers “zero liability,” meaning they mandate that financial institutions reimburse cardholders. Assuming those consumers meet certain fraud reporting requirements, they would pay nothing for unauthorized transactions.



Both Visa and MasterCard offer such a zero liability policy if the purchases in question are made with signatures. Visa, for instance, offers a zero liability policy for signature transactions processed over the Visa network, and MasterCard offers a similar policy, assuming certain requirements are met.



The protections for PIN purchases, however, are more varied. While Visa offers zero liability as well for PIN transactions processed over Interlink, its PIN debit network, MasterCard doesn’t offer a similar zero liability policy for PIN transactions “at this point,” said a MasterCard spokeswoman.



According to the spokeswoman, MasterCard does not offer zero liability for PIN purchases for a number of reasons, including, most important, the fact that its network processes only a small percentage of the PIN transactions used with its cards.



Financial institutions, however, may offer their own zero liability policy or other protections for PIN transactions. For instance, while the Star network, which processes PIN transactions, does not require that financial institutions offer zero liability, it is “aware of financial institutions that do offer zero liability as standard practice for all debit card transactions — whether they are PIN or signature authenticated,” said a spokeswoman for First Data, the parent company of the Star network.



To find out what protections you have for PIN transactions, look at the back of your debit card to see which networks may handle your transactions and check with your bank to see if you’re guaranteed anything beyond federal regulations for fraudulent PIN transactions.



According to David Robertson, publisher of the Nilson Report, a major reason for the additional protections for signature transactions is that there’s a much greater risk of fraudulent signature than fraudulent PIN transactions. “Visa and MasterCard have tried to mitigate that differential between the signature and the PIN networks by offering zero liability,” he said.



If you’re worried about fraud, Michelle Jun, a staff lawyer at the Consumers Union, recommends using your credit card instead of your debit card because of the additional protections available for credit cards.



The federal liability cap for credit cards is $50, and when you report a fraudulent credit transaction, a hold is put on your account and you don’t have to pay the disputed amount.